Screening wild and cultivated cucurbits against root knot nematode to exploit as rootstocks for grafting in cucumber
Abstract
Yield of mono-cropped cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) is reduced by root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita Kofoid and White). Use of resistant rootstocks in grafting may overcome the problem. Cucurbitaceous species were screened against root knot nematode to evaluate their use as rootstocks in grafting. Inoculation was with nematodes @ 2 J2·g-1 (J2 = second stage juvenile) of soil in pot culture at the 1 to 2 true leaf stage, 45 days after inoculation, plants were uprooted and observations made to calculate Root Knot Nematode Index (RKI). Cucurbita moschata, Cucumis metuliferus, Citrullus colocynthis and Cucumis callosus were resistant having a RKI-2. Cucurbita ficifolia, Cucurbita maxima, Cucumis melo sub sp. agrestis were moderately resistant with a RKI-3. Total phenols content in roots indicates plant resistance to M. incognita. Cucumis metuliferus had the highest mean total phenols content (16.98 mg·g- 1 of root) followed by Citrullus colocynthis (16.08 mg·g-1 of root) and Cucurbita moschata (15.37mg·g-1 of root). Resistant rootstocks possessed higher peroxidase and PPO activity than susceptible ones. Cucumis metuliferus had the highest value of peroxidase and PPO activity (3.83 OD·min-1·g-1 of root and 3.67 OD·min-1·g-1 of root) followed by Citrullus colocynthis (3.26 and 3.63 OD·min-1·g-1 of root), Cucumis callosus (3.02 and 2.98 OD·min-1·g-1 of root) and Cucurbita moschata (2.93 and 2.94 OD·min-1·g-1 of root). Cucumber scions, ‘Green Long’ and ‘NS 408’ had lower peroxidase and PPO activity of 0.64 and 1.42 OD·min-1·g-1 and 0.57 and 1.31 OD·min- 1·g-1 of root, respectively. Resistant and moderately resistant cucurbitaceous species may be used for further studies possibly leading to improved yield.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amin, A.W., A. Wanis, M. Tomader, and G. Abdel
Rahman. 2012. Evaluation of some
cucurbitaceous rootstocks. 1 - For resistance/
susceptibility to root-knot nematode and
fusarium wilt under screenhouse conditions.
Egyptian J. Agric. Res. 90(4):1561-1577.
Anwar, S.A. and M.V. McKenry, 2012. Incidence
and population density of plant-parasitic
nematodes infecting vegetable crops and
associated yield losses. Pakistan J. Zool.
:327-333.
Balasubramanian, M. and D. Purushothaman. 1972.
Phenolic contents of root knot affected
tissues. Indian J. Nematol. 2:77-94.
Barons, K.C. 1939. Studies of the nature of root
knot resistance. J. Agric. Res. 58:263-271.
Bray, H.G. and W.V. Thrope. 1954. Analysis of
phenolic compounds of interest in metabolism.
Meth. Biochem. Anal. 1:27-52.
Cobb, N.A. 1918. Estimating the nematode
population of soil. Technology Circular 1, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Davis, E.L., R.S. Hussey, T.J. Baum, J. Bakker, A.
Schots, M.N. Rosso and P. Abad. 2000.
Nematode parasitism genes. Ann. Rev.
Phytopath. 38:365-396.
Hadisoeganda, W.W. and J.N. Sasser. 1982.
Resistance of tomato, bean, southern pea and
garden pea cultivars to root knot nematodes
based on host suitability. Plant Dis. 66:145-
Heald, C.M., B.D. Bruton and R.M. Davis. 1989.
Influence of Glomus intradices and soil
phosphorus on M. incognita infecting
Cucumis melo. J. Nematol. 21:69-73.
Ibrahim, K.S. 1991. Peroxidase isoenzymes from
Meloidogyne cultured on different hosts. Rev.
Nematol. 14:335-344.
Krishnaveni, M. and S. Subramanian. 2002. Rootknot
nematodes of cucurbits and their
management. National symposium on
biodiversity and management of nematodes
in cropping systems for sustainable
agriculture. Department of Nematology,
Agricultural Research Station, 11-13
November 2002, Durgapura, Jaipur, India
Panse, V.G. and P.V. Sukhatme. 1957. Statistical
methods for agricultural workers. Indian
Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
Ploeg, A.T. and M.S. Phillips. 2001. Damage to
melon (Cucumis melo L.) cv. Durango by
Meloidogyne incognita in Southern
California. Nematology 3:151-158.
Roberts, P.A. and D. May. 1986. Meloidogyne
incognita resistance characteristics in tomato
genotypes developed for processing. J.
Nematol., 18: 173-178.
Sasser, J.N., H.R. Powers and G.B. Lucas. 1957.
Effect of root knot nematodes on the
expression of black shank resistance in
tobacco. Physiopathology 43:483-89.
Siguenza, C., M. Schochow, T. Turini, and A.
Ploeg.2005. Use of Cucumis metuliferus as
a rootstock for melon to manage
Meloidogyne incognita. J. Nematol. 37:276
-280.
Schindler, A.F. 1961. A simple substitute for a
Baermann funnel. Plant Dis. Rptr. 45:747-
Srivastava, S.K. 1987. Peroxidase and polyphenol
oxidase in Brassica juncea plants infected
with Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi.)
Goid and their implication in disease
resistance. J. Phytopath. 120:249-254.
Tamilselvi, N.A.T. 2013. Grafting studies in bitter
gourd (Momordica charantia L.). PhD
(Horticulture) Thesis, Depa rtment of
Vegetable Crops, Tamil Nadu Agricultural
University, Coimbatore.
Trudgill, D.L. 1995. Origins of root-knot nematodes
(Meloidogyne spp.) in relation to their
cultural control. Phytoparasitica 23:191-194.
Williamson, V.M. 1999. Plant nematode resistance
genes. Curr. Plant Biol. 2:327-331.
Williamson, V.M. and A. Kumar. 2006. Nematode
resistance in plants: The battle underground.
Trends Genet. 22:396-403.
Williamson, V.M. and R.S. Hussey. 1996. Nematode
pathogenesis and resistance in plants. Plant
Cell, 8:1735-1745.
Zacheo, G. and T.B. Zacheo. 1995. Plant-nematode
interactions: Histological, physiological and
biochemical interactions, pp. 321-353, In: K.
Kohmoto, U.M., Singh, and R.P. Singh (eds.).
Pathogenesis and host specificity in plant
diseases. Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.
Copyright (c) 2019 C. Thangamani, L. Pugalendhi, V. Punithaveni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.